Monday 2 September 2013

SOS II-III

I was mistaken in the previous post to say that Poul Anderson's "SOS," section II, (IN Dialogue With Darkness, New York, 1985, p. 205) presents an Asian viewpoint character. It describes Pitar Cheng, commander of the fleet that has captured the Farside station, but he is seen from the viewpoint of our already established central character, Ing Jans.

The title's significance emerges. From the station, Asian missiles will destroy the Westrealm space navy when it lands on Nearside soon. The problem for Jans becomes how to get an SOS message out of the station just as Dominic Flandry needs to smuggle a Mayday message from a colony planet in the similarly entitled "Mayday Orbit."

"SOS" presents three conflicts:

ideological - the collectivist and egalitarian Autarchism of Great Asia as against what a critic calls the "...neofeudal timocracy..." of the Westrealm (p. 195);

ecological - which system can respond more effectively to the imminent terrestrial magnetic field reversal which is expected to cause extinctions and mutations?;

personal: which system does Jans really support?

All this and the Lunar setting are a lot to convey in a few pages.

As in several of Anderson's puzzle stories, there comes a moment when our hero suddenly realizes what he must do:

"He stopped dead. A shudder went through his body, a shout through his brain." (p. 210)

- but the reader must not be told till later, when the battle has been won. Indeed, Jans must lie in order to conceal his realization from his captors.

But there is a twist in the tale. The Asians are defeated but meanwhile the terrestrial magnetic field has nosedived again and will last for another year at most... Jans' less alarmist approach to this issue was mistaken.

5 comments:

Sean M. Brooks said...

Hi, Paul!

And I disagree with the last sentence of this piece of yours. Whatever its flaws, the free market approach of Westrealm to solving problems is still better than the totalitarianism of the Asians. The problem is, NEITHER side, because of the sudden nosediving of Earth's magnetic field, may have the time needed for coping with ecological/economic/sociological collapse.

Sean

Paul Shackley said...

Sean,
I was trying not to take sides between the two systems but to reflect back on Jans' earlier dialogue. When asked whether man might become extinct, he replied, "I don't believe that can happen...Nothing so drastic happened before. You're stretching the probabilities entirely out of shape." (p. 206)
At the end, it seems that drastic measures to try to save a few might be the only option left.
Paul.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Hi, Paul!

Yes, I was a little too hasty. Sorry!

And, yes, given the kind of emergency situation we see the beginnings of at the end of SOS, martial law style emergency measures to save a few does seems indicated. In the hope that such a remnant might be able to ensure the mere survival of the human race.

And we don't know what happened after SOS. Poul Anderson seems to have written only this single story with that background.

Sean

Jim Baerg said...

I think that after Anderson wrote this story, paleontologists looked as whether there was any correlation between magnetic field reversals & extinctions, & found none. So the idea that the magnetic field declining to zero for while being more than an inconvenience seems unlikely.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Jim!

Considering all the other problems mankind faces, that is just as well!

Ad astra! Sean