Friday 7 April 2017

Brains Precede Persons

In Motivations, I listed the differing motivations of twenty four different Poul Anderson characters.

In Motivations II, I proposed that each intelligent being is both a unique combination of genes and a unique organism-environment interaction, the point being that the characters' motivations differ because they are determined by uniquely different sets of genes followed by unique interactions. Further, which gene-bearing sperm and egg meet in the first place is a matter of luck.

For an earlier Motivations II that I had forgotten, see here.

See also Changing Motivations and Basic Motivations.

In Luck, I quoted the view that chance or luck alone determines those developments within the brain which in turn make the difference between genius, average ability or ineptitude, e.g., in mathematics. No one can exercise conscious control over processes inside his own brain. On the contrary, some such processes must already have occurred before there exists an entity describable as a person capable of making conscious decisions or choices.

Our most basic motivations arise from a chance meeting between a sperm and an egg followed by a unique series of interactions between our organism and its natural and social environments, accompanied by chance events inside our brains. And all of this finally explains why Adzel in the Technic History wants enlightenment whereas the Neldorians in the Time Patrol timeline want luxurious living.

3 comments:

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

I don't understand what you meant by "chance events inside our brains." EVENTS can't happen inside our minds, only thoughts and emotions.

Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Sean,
By "events," I mean the electrochemical interactions between neurons/brain cells. We have no control over these. They can happen in ways that make, e.g., mathematical calculations fast or slow. They determine how we think. Each of us perceives something. Different parts of our brains interact. Our spontaneous responses to what we have perceived differ accordingly. What we then say differs and so on.
Paul.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

Thanks. That does clarify what you meant.

Sean